Reading time: 5 minutes
Unannounced IFS audits: how to keep your team ready on any day

Preparing a team for an IFS or BRCGS audit no longer means a review the week before: at least one in every three IFS audits is unannounced, so training has to be up to date on any day of the year.
At least one in every three IFS certification audits happens without notice. The standard sets a window from 16 weeks before to 2 weeks after the due date, and the site isn't told the day.¹ That completely changes how a team gets ready for a quality audit.
The classic model (an intensive review, folders checked and a talk to plant staff the week before) works when you know when the auditor is coming. With an 18-week window, it stops working. In this article we look at what the audit checks on training, where companies usually fall short, and how to use internal audits to stay ready all the time.
Training isn't only audited in the quality folder. Section 3.3 of IFS Food v8, on training and instruction, requires:²
BRCGS points the same way. In Issue 9, the training clause replaced "relevant personnel" with simply "staff": all staff must be trained before starting work, according to the summary of changes published by Mérieux NutriSciences.³
Both standards share something a folder can't prove on its own: that training works. The auditor checks that on the plant floor, by watching and asking the people on the line.
The most common training failures aren't missing documents, but the gap between what's documented and what happens on the shift:
| What the standard requires | Where it usually fails | How to have it ready on any day |
|---|---|---|
| Training before starting work | Temporary and external staff start before the group session | Initial training available on day one, without waiting to gather a group |
| Training in the appropriate language | Material only in Spanish for a multilingual workforce | Every piece available in the languages the workforce actually speaks |
| Evaluation of effectiveness | Only a signature sheet exists | A practical check at the station, recorded by the shift lead |
| Up-to-date content | Training is last year's, and the HACCP plan has changed | Each content item's review date is the same as or later than the procedure's |
| Staff who can answer | The operator can't explain the control at their station | Short role-based pieces reviewed before each peak season |
The middle column is what shows up in non-conformity reports. The right-hand column is what turns an unannounced audit into a normal day.
If the external audit can arrive on any day, the internal audit stops being a yearly formality and becomes the ongoing rehearsal. These three habits make it manageable.
The internal training audit has to include questions to operators at their station, just as the external auditor will: what do you control here, what do you do if the reading goes out of limit, who do you tell. Five questions per line and shift tell you more than reviewing a hundred records.
If an operator can't answer, the finding isn't closed with a note in the report. It's closed when that person, and others in the same role, have reviewed the content and shown they know it. IFS specifically asks that training reviews take into account feedback from previous training.²
Every change in procedure, recipe or equipment has to reach the training for the affected role. Platforms that generate training from the procedure itself, such as Vidext, cut that lag down to hours, but the principle works with any tool: a training item's review date should never be earlier than that of the procedure it explains.
Official control points the same way. In the food safety management system audits carried out by Spanish authorities, the share of establishments with no non-conformities rose from 49.25% in 2021 to 84.04% in 2024, and the checklists include the training of those responsible.⁴ Companies that audit their training continuously arrive better prepared for any audit, announced or not.
For the full framework on what the rules require for HACCP training and food safety culture, read our guide to HACCP training and Regulation 2021/382.
The unannounced audit rule doesn't add new training requirements; it removes the option of meeting them only the week before. A company where every role is trained before starting, in their language, with up-to-date content and checks on the floor doesn't need to know when the auditor is coming. That's the real standard IFS and BRCGS set today.
At least one in every three IFS certification audits must be unannounced. It takes place within a window from 16 weeks before to 2 weeks after the due date, without notifying the site of the day. Companies can choose to have more unannounced audits voluntarily.
Training programmes with their content, frequency, languages and trainer; records with participants, signatures, date, duration and content; and the procedure that proves training effectiveness. The auditor also usually checks on the floor that staff can apply what they learned.
They need training before they start work, audit or not. IFS Food v8 explicitly includes temporary staff, seasonal workers and employees of external companies, and BRCGS Issue 9 extends the requirement to all staff.
With evidence beyond attendance: results of questions or tests after training, practical checks at the station recorded by the supervisor, and no repeated errors in controls. A signature sheet alone doesn't prove effectiveness.
An internal audit is carried out by the company itself to check its system works; a certification audit is carried out by an accredited external body against the standard. If the internal audit mirrors the external method, including questions on the floor, it becomes the best possible preparation.
¹ Unannounced IFS Audits - Fact sheet - IFS ² IFS Progress Food v3 - IFS Food v8 checklists comparison - IFS ³ BRCGS Food Safety Issue 9: whitepaper - Mérieux NutriSciences ⁴ Programa 2: Auditorías de los sistemas de gestión de la seguridad alimentaria 2024 - AESAN
Programme to promote permanent employment of qualified young people within the framework of the National Youth Guarantee System. Vidext has received a grant of €25,401 awarded by LABORA (Valencian Employment and Training Service) for the permanent hiring in 2024 of qualified young person(s) registered in the National Youth Guarantee System, an action eligible for co-financing by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) 2021-2027 or any other European Union fund. Expediente ECOGJU/2024/550/46. This publication is made in compliance with the transparency obligations established by Spanish Law 19/2013 of 9 December.



