Reading time: 11 minutes
The Vidext Visual Refactoring Framework for L&D Content
There's a type of L&D manager we know well. They've spent years building a solid catalog: documented industrial SOPs, onboarding manuals, compliance presentations, procedure sheets for every shift. Hundreds of files. Dozens of folders. Real work behind all of it.
The problem isn't a lack of content. The problem is that nobody consumes it.
The materials exist in formats that create friction before the employee even reaches the first paragraph. A 34-page PDF to learn how to operate a production line. A 2017 presentation updated with an asterisk at the bottom. A printed manual someone scanned and uploaded to the LMS three years ago. Having content is not the same as having functional training. That's what we call Document Inertia: the knowledge exists, but it's trapped in formats nobody opens.
The Vidext Visual Refactoring Framework is the methodological response to that problem. It's not a tool. It's a four-phase structured process for transforming a static training catalog into Living Knowledge Infrastructure — modular, updatable, and traceable content that industrial teams actually use.
In this article, we walk through how each phase works, which types of content benefit most from this process, and what L&D teams can expect when they apply it.
The term matters. Refactoring is not the same as digitizing, converting, or recording.
Digitizing training means uploading a PDF to the LMS. The content is still a PDF — it's just in a different folder now. The underlying problem doesn't change.
Converting to video means recording a screen or exporting a presentation as an MP4. The result is a long, dense video that's just as hard to consume as the original.
Refactoring means redesigning the knowledge architecture for a new medium. It involves breaking a document down into its actual learning units, reorganizing them according to a pedagogical hierarchy, assigning the right visual format to each type of content, and rebuilding the whole as a modular system that can be updated, translated, and tracked independently.
It's the same process a developer applies when refactoring code: the end result does the same thing, but the internal structure is completely different — more maintainable, more scalable, more readable.
For L&D teams in industrial settings, this means a 40-page safety SOP doesn't become a 40-minute video. It becomes six modules of two to five minutes each, every one focused on a specific learning objective, with integrated assessment and xAPI traceability to the LMS.
"Visual Refactoring is not about converting a PDF into a video. It's about redesigning the knowledge architecture so it can be consumed, maintained, and scaled in modular visual format."
Over 80% of all content produced on the Vidext platform is internal training. Not marketing, not external communications. Training: industrial SOPs, compliance, onboarding, workplace safety, food safety. That data reflects where the real pain is for the companies looking for a solution.
In industrial settings, that pain is structural. Companies with 500 or 2,000 employees have years of operational knowledge documented in formats that produce three concrete consequences:
Low completion rates. Research from the training industry shows that well-structured microlearning modules reach completion rates close to 80%, compared to less than 20% for long unmodularized training.¹ It's not that employees don't want to learn. It's that the format doesn't help.
Expensive and delayed updates. When a regulation changes, updating a manual means redesigning, reprinting, and redistributing. The practical result is that many companies have outdated versions circulating for months. In regulatory compliance, that's a real risk.
Impossible traceability. If content isn't in a format compatible with xAPI or SCORM, there's no way to know who completed what. In an ISO 45001 audit, that gap is a concrete problem, not a theoretical risk.
Visual Refactoring solves all three at once, because the underlying problem is the same: content trapped in structures that aren't designed to be consumed, maintained, or tracked.
The framework is sequential. Each phase produces an output that feeds the next. You can't refactor well what hasn't been audited first.
The starting point isn't the most urgent content. It's the full catalog.
The first phase maps all existing training materials: what's there, what format it's in, who it's for, when it was created, and when it was last updated. That inventory reveals three types of content:
The output of this phase is a prioritization matrix with two axes: training impact (what happens if this content doesn't work well?) and current maintenance cost (how much time and money does updating it consume?). High-impact, high-maintenance-cost quadrants are the clearest candidates for Visual Refactoring.
With the prioritized inventory in hand, the second phase analyzes the real friction of each piece of content.
Document Inertia isn't the same across all materials. An 8-page manual with clear visuals can work reasonably well on paper. A 60-page technical procedure with specification tables is a serious case of inertia: dense, non-interactive, lacking visual hierarchy, impossible to update without rebuilding the entire document.
The high-inertia signals we look for in this phase are:
This diagnosis defines the level of intervention needed: some content requires full refactoring, others only need modularization and visual formatting.
This is the central phase of the framework. And the principle that governs it is clear: the document doesn't get converted — the knowledge architecture gets redesigned.
The process starts by identifying the actual learning units inside the existing material. A production line SOP isn't a 45-page document: it's a set of six or seven independent procedures, each with its own objective, its own steps, and its own risk level. That's the structure that needs to emerge from the refactoring process.
Each module's hierarchy follows three levels:
The visual format of each module is assigned based on content type. Physical processes that happen on the plant floor — how to operate a machine, how to handle an incident — benefit most from visual sequences with motion and narration. Procedures in digital systems or internal tools work better with screencast and voiceover. Regulatory or company values content works well in a more narrative format with avatar and voice.
This is where Vidext comes in practically: the L&D team imports the original PPT or PDF, the system generates a module-structured script draft, and the training manager reviews and adjusts it before producing. What used to take weeks of production work becomes a process measured in hours.
The output of this process is not a video. It's a system.
The fourth phase consolidates the result of the refactoring into a training architecture with three characteristics the original material never had: it's updatable, it's traceable, and it's scalable.
Updatable means that when a regulation or procedure changes, the change is applied to the affected module — not the entire catalog. Through prompts or direct in-platform editing, the training manager can update content without external audiovisual production or document redesign.
Traceable means each module emits consumption data compatible with SCORM or xAPI to the company's LMS. You know who completed what, when, and with what result. ISO 45001, the international standard for occupational health and safety management systems, requires documented evidence that workers have received and understood the required training. That requirement is impossible to meet systematically with PDFs or presentations distributed by email. An xAPI module generates that record automatically, for every playthrough, for every employee.
Scalable means content produced in one language can be automatically exported in 40+ languages without multiplying production costs. For industrial companies with international teams or workers from diverse backgrounds, that removes a real operational barrier.
That's what we call Living Knowledge Infrastructure: not a file that gets distributed, but a structure that stays alive.
"Industrial companies don't have a content problem. They have a Document Inertia problem: the knowledge exists, but it's trapped in formats nobody consumes."
The Visual Refactoring Framework doesn't solve every internal communication problem. There's a clear range of content where it works well, and an equally clear boundary where it doesn't make sense.
| Content type | Recommended format |
|---|---|
| Industrial SOPs with a useful life of months or years | Modular video with xAPI |
| Compliance and regulatory training | Modular video + assessment |
| Mass onboarding with high turnover | Multilingual modular video |
| Complex technical procedures | Procedural video with screencast |
| Day-to-day operational communications | Direct message / chat channel |
| Pricing, shift changes, real-time updates | Immediate communication, not training |
| Occasional technical reference documentation | PDF or structured wiki |
The line sits at frequency of use and the nature of the content. Materials consumed once, updated in real time, or serving as occasional reference are not candidates for Visual Refactoring. Materials that need to be understood, retained, and completed by a large number of people on a recurring basis are.
L&D teams in industrial companies that apply this process report changes in four areas:
Production time for new modules drops significantly. What used to require coordinating with external production companies, recordings, and weeks of editing becomes an internal process the training team controls. Vidext documents production time reductions of up to 70% in industrial sector clients.²
Dead versions disappear from the system. When content lives on a platform with version control and centralized editing, there are no 2021 PDFs circulating by email alongside 2024 PDFs. The active catalog is the only one that exists.
Plant-floor onboarding gets structured. A company with high production line turnover can bring new employees up to speed with a modular training itinerary that covers the minimum competencies in safety, operations, and procedures before the worker reaches the role. The training manager knows exactly what each person has completed.
Traceability for ISO 45001, workplace safety, or regulatory compliance audits becomes systematic. Every completed module generates a record in the LMS. That record is evidence, not just history.
Most industrial companies with serious L&D teams share the same problem: a catalog of real, valuable, well-built knowledge that nobody consumes because it's in the wrong format.
Visual Refactoring doesn't start with the tool. It starts with auditing what already exists, diagnosing where the inertia is, redesigning the knowledge architecture, and building infrastructure that can stay alive without depending on external production.
The four phases of the Vidext framework are the structured process for doing exactly that. Not in the abstract — with each company's specific catalog, their priority training verticals, and their real constraints around team and budget.
If you're evaluating how to apply this process in your organization, you can see how industrial L&D teams work with Vidext by requesting a demo at vidext.io.
Digitizing training means moving existing content to a digital medium without changing its structure: uploading a PDF to the LMS, exporting a presentation to Google Slides. Visual Refactoring redesigns the knowledge architecture so it's modular, consumable, and maintainable in video format. The result isn't the same document on a different platform — it's a different learning structure with built-in metrics, traceability, and update capability.
No. Phase 1 of the framework (Training Inventory Audit) is specifically designed to identify which materials need full refactoring, which only require modularization, and which can stay in their current format. Not everything in the catalog has the same level of Document Inertia or the same training impact.
Industrial SOPs with a long useful life, compliance and regulatory training, and mass onboarding programs with high turnover are the highest-impact cases. They share a common profile: a large number of people who need to complete them, a real need for traceability, and an update frequency that makes static format maintenance expensive.
It depends on the catalog volume and the level of Document Inertia in the materials. For companies with 50-100 prioritized modules, Phases 1 and 2 (audit and diagnosis) typically complete in two to three weeks of L&D team work. Phase 3 (structural refactoring) varies by volume, but with an AI platform like Vidext the team can produce between 10 and 20 modules per week without external production support.
¹ Microlearning completion rates vs. long-form eLearning — Vouch, via Continu Research
² Production time reduction data in industrial clients — Vidext, internal documentation 2025
@ 2026 Vidext Inc.
Newsletter
Discover all news and updates from Vidext
@ 2026 Vidext Inc.
